After watching this video on neurite outgrowth from garlandscience, I cannot help but think that graphs are too clean and neutral as a visualizing tool for connectivist learning.
What I came to learn about growth cones and axon guidance is that first, axons has a synaptic target. It means that they select what they connect to. They don't just randomly connect to whatever neuron is nearby.
But then how do they establish a target in the first place? The axon guidance article in Wikipedia states that they "'sniff out' the extracellular environment for signals that instruct the axon which direction to grow" and that there are specific molecules in the extracellular environment that repel or attract the axon growth.
This doesn't answer my question. It just says that the axon moves left or right etc. given some mollecules in the environment. But the articles are silent in how the environment in the brain is regulated, that is, what increases a particular repulsive molecule in a certain area and an attractive molecule in another. The lab experiments seem to be injecting these molecules in vitro rather than observing their production in their natural setting.
In connectivist learning, the role of a curator or someone who can guide another person towards a node/actor/vector is important. It filters the environment, thereby playing the role of the unknown agent that produces repulsive and attractive cues. A person may recommend a website as a resource for a particular research or dissuade others from reading another website.
An interesting idea to me is the fact that human beings can set targets or goals, and can change those as they sniff the environment. Can neurons do the same, can they set themselves to targetting a another neuron that has a specific amount of molecules or other attributes? The neurons that have outgrowths that connect to cells in the eyes, nose, ears etc. seems to have predetermined targets. How do we separate this kind of connection with connection due to learning in the brain in relation to an analogy for the social and conceptual mode in connectivism?
Bye-bye 2024, I won’t miss you.
-
Well, it’s been one heck of a year. ::shaking head:: Although I love
getting those end-of-year postcards from folks, I’ve never managed to make
them. Inste...
Title (Optional)
-
undefined
grantpotter (@grantpotter) wrote:
@dnorman yikes! Great that you could find it .. happened to me once .. was
about to give up when we found it ...
Dulcimer Video
-
I have been neglecting this blog for so long, that I think it was
threatening to get rid of me! I am well, have a new PaceMaker to keep the
[…]
Beingness: From Epistemology to Ontology
-
A few thoughts in preparation for our upcoming Cognitive Escalation
workshop (free registration). I’ve been struggling to understand what we
should be […]
Games of the Year 2018
-
So my New Year’s resolution is (once again) to blog more regularly. Rather
than start with a rant about the state of the world in general, and Higher
Educa...
[liveblog][bkc] Algorithmic fairness
-
I’m at a special Berkman Klein Center Tuesday lunch, a panel on
“Programming the Future of AI: Ethics, Governance, and Justice” with
Cynthia Dwork, Chris...
Global Conflicts: Palestine – New study
-
At the brink of the 10th year anniversary of our first game Global
Conflicts: Palestine it is nice to see that it still attracts interest in
the form of an...
RobotBASIC: A STEM-focused Progamming Language
-
I’ve been talking with John Blankenship on LinkedIn about RobotBASIC, which
allows students to control robots as well as create simulations and video
games...
-
Originally posted on EdTechDev:
In case the quotes didn’t clue you in, this post doesn’t argue against
massive open online courses (MOOCs) such as the ones ...